This is part 1 of a 32-part series.
Final standings:
Lipscomb 14-2
Liberty 14-2
North Florida 9-7
FGCU 9-7
NJIT 8-8
North Alabama 7-9
Jacksonville 5-11
Kennesaw St 3-13
Format:
Quarterfinals March 4, semis March 7, finals March 10. Higher seed hosts each game.
Matchups:
1) Lipscomb vs. 8) Kennesaw St
4) FGCU vs. 5) NJIT
3) North Florida vs. 6) North Alabama
2) Liberty vs. 7) Jacksonville
The stakes:
Hey! Usually this is a zero-stakes event from a national perspective, but there's mild bubble intrigue here!
Lipscomb has a top 50 NET, and their non-con SoS was 67, so they had some opportunity to get some quality wins. Let's dive a bit deeper.
2-3 vs. Q1 (beat @TCU, @Liberty, lost to @Louisville, @Clemson, @Belmont)
1-2 vs. Q2 (beat @SMU, lost to Belmont, Liberty)
notable Q3 results: beat Vermont, lost @FGCU
I dunno, it feels like they're one significant result short. A split of Belmont, or eking out that Louisville game, would change everything. There are 11 true road wins. You can certainly make a case for them, but I fear committee trends say that they won't try. (it goes without saying that if they lose to anyone but Liberty.....)
If you're wondering, Liberty has a NET of 62, split with Lipscomb, and won at UCLA. But they're only .500 against Q1/2/3 teams, they lost a couple too many, and their non-con SoS was poor, unlike Lipscomb. The real argument is the NIT for them, and I really, really hope their season is rewarded by the NIT committee.
North Alabama is transitioning and ineligible, so in the unlikely event they win this, Lipscomb goes in their place I think.
One blog note: I'm no longer discussing potential CBI/CIT bids. It's clear based on the past cuple years that they can't get a full field, so anyone who wants to play them, can go. No need for projections there anymore.
2 comments:
Go Lipscomb
Love your breakdowns.. never change!
Post a Comment