Monday, February 1, 2016

Bubble watch part 5: One-bid leagues

A-East

Conference title race:
Stony Brook (15-4) (8-0) RPI 55 SoS 196 – Clearly the class of the conference, and have (for them) quality wins over Princeton and Hofstra.  The RPI is inflated, but will still help them in March.
Albany (16-6) (6-2) RPI 103 SoS 275 – They’ve already lost to SBU, so the race is essentially over.

EIEIO/Vegas watch:
Vermont (12-10) (5-3) RPI 164 SoS 205
New Hampshire (10-9) (5-3) RPI 198 SoS 303 – Both teams are probably bubble teams for the postseason.

No postseason:
UMass-Lowell (6-14, 3-5) is still transitioning.  The others are below or around RPI 300:  Maine (8-13, 4-4), Hartford (6-16, 2-6), Binghamton (5-16, 2-6), and UMBC (5-18, 1-7).

A-Sun

Conference title race:
North Florida (15-6) (7-0) RPI 101 SoS 265 – I’m not even going to list a second team.  UNF is clearly the best in this conference.  They beat Illinois which may be enough to get it off the 16 line.  Everyone else would be headed to Dayton.

EIEIO/Vegas watch:
NJIT (11-11) (3-4) RPI 193 SoS 228 – Hey, not bad for them!

No postseason:
I’m listing them under here, but both Jacksonville (9-11, 5-2) and FGCU (9-10, 4-3) have a good shot at getting over .500.  Their computer numbers are horrid, but that hasn’t stopped the CIT before.  The bottom four, though, are truly out of it:  Lipscomb (5-17, 3-4), South Carolina Upstate (5-15, 2-5), Stetson (4-15, 2-5) (who is APR’d anyways), Kennesaw St (4-17, 2-5).

Big Sky

Conference title race:
Montana (10-7) (8-1) RPI 137 SoS 222 – Actually has a non-con SoS of 28, and beat Boise. Better than your average 16 seed.
Weber St (12-6) (7-1) RPI 156 SoS 297 – Not as great.

EIEIO/Vegas watch:
Idaho (11-9) (5-4) RPI 204 SoS 306 – Pretty bad sign when I have to stretch this far just to find a third team from the conference to list.

No postseason:
It’s a large mass of blah here.  Only two teams above RPI 200 in the entire conference.  Idaho St (8-10, 5-3) and Eastern Washington (9-10, 5-4) might get above .500 and get them some postseason, but who knows.  Sacramento St (7-10, 2-6) actually won at Arizona St, but is otherwise hopeless.  Also futile:  North Dakota (7-10, 5-4), Northern Colorado (6-13, 5-4), Montana St (8-12, 4-5), Portland St (5-12, 3-5), Southern Utah (3-15, 2-7), and Northern Arizona (1-17, 1-8).

Big South

Conference title race:
Winthrop (13-6) (8-3) RPI 162 SoS 329
UNC-Asheville (13-8) (8-3) RPI 151 SoS 255
High Point (11-7) (7-3) RPI 176 SoS 318 – This is a pretty wide-open conference and there’s little differentiating between all the teams.  This is one of those scenarios where it won’t matter who wins as far as bracketing purposes go.

EIEIO/Vegas watch:
Coastal Carolina (10-8) (7-4) RPI 193 SoS 271
Radford (11-10) (6-5) RPI 159 SoS 180

No postseason:
The bottom half of the conference is its usual bad self, and the Big South is in the crossfire of Dayton as a result:  Gardner Webb (8-12, 6-5), Liberty (6-15, 6-5), Charleston Southern (5-14, 4-7), Presbyterian (5-13, 3-7), Longwood (3-17, 2-8), Campbell (6-13, 2-9).

Big West

Conference title race:
UC-Irvine (15-6) (6-1) RPI 72 SoS 132
Hawaii (14-3) (5-1) RPI 122 SoS 252 – The conference’s RPI is healthy, and the results for the top two here are manageable.  Hawaii beat UNI, Nevada, and Auburn, Irvine scheduled up and beat @Utah St, NMSU and BC.

No postseason:
It’s much trickier to guess who else will make the postseason from this conference.  There are two teams with sub-100 RPIs, but they’re kinda under .500 overall, which is an obvious problem.  Long Beach St (9-12, 5-3) owns the #1 non-con SoS in the country, and beat BYU and N-Seton Hall and @Colorado St and NMSU…but lost to many other great teams.  If they can crawl to .500 they’re a lock for a bid, and still might get a Vegas bid.  UC-Santa Barbara (8-11, 3-4) has the #8 non-con SoS, but a couple in-conference losses might doom them.  UC-Riverside (11-11, 4-4) has a chance of staying at .500.  The other 4 are in varying states of hopelessness:  UC-Davis (7-11, 4-3), Cal Poly (8-11, 3-4), Cal St-Northridge (5-14, 2-5), and Cal St-Fullerton (6-12, 1-6).

CAA

Conference title race:
UNC-Wilmington (14-5) (8-2) RPI 92 SoS 219
Hofstra (15-6) (8-2) RPI 70 SoS 126
Towson (14-7) (7-3) RPI 178 SoS 324
James Madison (15-7) (6-4) RPI 98 SoS 128
William & Mary (13-6) (7-3) RPI 38 SoS 85 – This might be the best multi-team race of the season.  This conference as a whole had a renaissance in the non-con, and they’re all reaping the benefits of each other now.  W&M has the shiny RPI, and did win at NC State, but otherwise the profile is marginal, so don’t overreact.  Heck, Hofstra beat FSU and St Bonaventure.  The other 3 have more marginal profiles, which might prevent a 13 seed, though.  Towson in particular has some issues.

EIEIO/Vegas watch:
Charleston (12-8) (5-5) RPI 95 SoS 116 – As you can see, the conference was deep with decent teams this year. 
Elon (11-10) (4-6) RPI 116 SoS 94
Northeastern (11-11) (3-6) RPI 137 SoS 116 – They beat @Miami and appear to have let it gone to waste.

No postseason:
One of the big keys to the CAA’s ascension this year is the lack of teams in this region.  Every non-bad team stepped up and won a lot in the non-con and built decent computer profiles.  Only the two knowingly bad teams, Drexel (3-17, 1-9) and Delaware (5-16, 0-10) are in this range.  Getting everyone else to rise up has been key to gaming the RPI system this year.  It will pay off in their seed, although not in the form of an at-large bid.

CUSA

Conference title race:
UAB (17-4) (8-1) RPI 106 SoS 298 – Their non-con SoS is in the 300s, which is why they’re a non-starter in the bubble talk.  MTSU is their signature win, and they lost to Auburn and Illinois.  Can’t stay in the race with that.
Middle Tennessee (13-6) (7-2) RPI 79 SoS 132
Marshall (11-11) (7-2) RPI 141 SoS 105

EIEIO/Vegas watch:
Louisiana Tech (14-5) (5-3) RPI 135 SoS 296
Old Dominion (12-10) (5-4) RPI 159 SoS 151 – Meh to both of them.

No postseason:
CUSA is not in the top 20 of the CRPI.  8 of their 14 teams reside below RPI 200.  That’s just simply unacceptable.  UTEP (10-11, 3-6) is way down this year.  Southern Miss (6-11, 4-4) is vacuuming conference wins while being ineligible.  FIU (9-11, 5-4) and Western Kentucky (9-11, 3-6) might be postseason eligible, but why anyone would want them is beyond me.  There’s just a lot of poor situations up and down the line.  Others:  Charlotte (7-14, 4-5), Florida Atlantic (5-15, 4-5), Rice (5-14, 2-6), North Texas (5-14, 2-6), and UTSA (3-17, 2-7).

Ivy

Conference title race:
Yale (12-5) (4-0) RPI 82 SoS 180
Columbia (13-6) (4-0) RPI 131 SoS 218
Princeton (11-5) (2-1) RPI 62 SoS 140 – It’ll probably be between these 3, although there’s a long way to go in the race because of their annual late start.  No one really has a signature win OOC to help their seed in March, though.

No postseason:
In previous years, the Ivy had done pretty okay OOC to help the seed of their conference champs.  Not as much this year.  Cornell (8-9, 2-2) and Harvard (7-11, 1-3) at least have tolerable RPIs.  Dartmouth (6-11, 1-3), Brown (5-12, 1-3), and Penn (5-11, 0-3) are all sub-300 in the RPI and will actively harm the leaders.

MAC

Conference title race:
Akron (16-4) (6-2) RPI 63 SoS 198
Kent St (14-6) (6-2) RPI 84 SoS 144 – Plenty of teams still have a chance, as illustrated by the fact no one’s done better than 6-2 so far.  But for now we’ll list these two.  The MAC is having a good RPI season, but neither of these two teams have the signature win they need to make it to the 12 line. 

EIEIO/Vegas watch:
Buffalo (11-9) (5-3) RPI 99 SoS 105
Ohio (12-7) (4-4) RPI 94 SoS 113
Northern Illinois (12-5) (5-3) RPI 104 SoS 240
Central Michigan (9-9) (5-3) RPI 145 SoS 111
Ball St (12-8) (4-4) RPI 182 SoS 250 – Has the conference’s signature win, over Valpo.

No postseason:
I have to predict some of the MAC teams to fall below .500 overall, so I’ll call Bowling Green (11-8, 4-4) and Toledo (11-9, 3-5) for those purposes.  One of the secrets to the MAC’s success this year:  the lowest RPI team is at 228 in Miami(OH) (6-14, 1-7).  Western Michigan (7-12, 3-5) and Eastern Michigan (6-11, 2-6) are also down but not actively harming the conference.  Well done.

MEAC

Conference title race:
Hampton (12-8) (8-1) RPI 189 SoS 326 – They’re the only team here above .500 overall so I’m not even listing a second team here, you can’t make me.  The SWAC is beating the MEAC this year, so that’s all you need to know.

No postseason:
South Carolina St (10-11, 7-2) will probably make it over .500, and who knows, maybe Norfolk St (8-13, 6-2) and Howard (7-11, 3-2) can too, although the worthiness of every team is very much in question.  Florida A&M (4-14, 2-5) is APR’d, and everyone else is terrible:  Bethune-Cookman (5-15, 4-4), UMES (5-16, 3-4), Coppin St (3-15, 3-4), Savannah St (6-12, 3-5), Morgan St (3-15, 2-4), Delaware St (2-17, 2-4), North Carolina A&T (6-16, 3-6), and North Carolina Central (4-14, 2-5).

NEC

Conference title race:
Wagner (13-7) (7-3) RPI 203 SoS 346
Fairleigh Dickinson (10-10) (7-3) RPI 223 SoS 308
Mount St Mary’s (10-13) (7-3) RPI 247 SoS 288 – No one in the conference is sub-200 in the RPI, and no one has a top 150 win.  Whoever wins is guaranteed to be in Dayton.

No postseason:
St Francis(PA) (9-11, 6-4), might be eligible, along with the above three, but that’s about it here.  Everyone else is sub-275 in the RPI:  St Francis(NY) (8-14, 5-5), Sacred Heart (6-15, 5-5), Long Island (10-11, 4-6), Bryant (6-16, 4-6), Robert Morris (6-17, 4-6), and Central Connecticut St (2-19, 1-9).

OVC

Conference title race:
Belmont (15-7) (8-1) RPI 85 SoS 183 – They’re obviously the class of the conference and beat Valpo.  Their ceiling is much higher than everyone else, who is looking at the 15 or maybe 16 line.  Belmont can get to the 13 line.
Tennessee Tech (14-7) (8-2) RPI 117 SoS 234 – Did beat Belmont.

EIEIO/Vegas watch:
Tennessee St (13-6) (6-2) RPI 166 SoS 340
Morehead St (11-9) (6-3) RPI 174 SoS 236

No postseason:
Perhaps the surprise is Murray St (9-11, 5-4) being down here.  The top 4 teams are in the east division, and it’ll cost Eastern Kentucky (11-12, 3-6) a postseason spot as they’re trapped in the tougher division.  Eastern Illinois (8-13, 6-4) leads the west but still probably won’t make the postseason.  Irrelevant teams:  Jacksonville St (6-17, 4-6), Tennessee-Martin (9-12, 3-5), Austin Peay (8-14, 3-6), SE Missouri St (3-17, 2-7), and SIU-Edwardsville (4-18, 1-9).

Patriot

Conference title race:
Bucknell (11-9) (9-1) RPI 173 SoS 202 – Here’s another conference where I’m not even listing a second team.  Bucknell had a rough non-con losing many swing games (Siena, Penn St, Columbia, Princeton, et al).  As you can see, not awful teams, but not great either.  Hi, 16 line.

EIEIO/Vegas watch:
Navy (14-7) (6-3) RPI 177 SoS 321
Boston (11-11) (5-5) RPI 221 SoS 316
Army (11-9) (3-6) RPI 214 SoS 333 – Yeah, these aren’t impressive resumes in this league this year.

No postseason:
I guess Colgate (9-11, 6-4) can get over .500 for the CIT, but otherwise there isn’t much going on here.  Among the failures:  Loyola(MD) (6-14, 5-4), Lehigh (5-14, 4-5), Holy Cross (9-12, 4-6), American (5-15, 3-6, and Lafayette (5-15, 2-7)

Southland

Conference title race:
Stephen F Austin (11-5) (8-0) RPI 143 SoS 309 – This is the team you’d think might have a shot, but scheduled up and lost all the big games.
Houston Baptist (10-7) (8-0) RPI 200 SoS 336
Texas A&M-Corpus Christi (14-4) (7-1) RPI 141 SoS 335 – As you can see, it’s going to take a lot for this conference to avoid the 16 line this year.  Garbage schedules are everywhere in this conference.  A win over Elon represents the entirety of the conference’s top 175 wins.

No postseason:
Everyone else is hopeless.  Incarnate Word (7-7, 5-2) can finish above .500 but are still in D-1 transition (actually, the CIT could take them).  Sam Houston St (8-10, 6-3) can get there.  Everyone else is out:  New Orleans (4-12, 3-5), McNeese St (3-12, 3-5), Lamar (6-11, 2-7), Northwestern St (2-13, 2-7), SE Louisiana (1-17, 1-6), Nicholls St (2-17, 1-7).  Abilene Christian (5-12, 4-4) is still transitioning and Central Arkansas (3-14, 2-5) is APR’d.

Summit

Conference title race:
South Dakota St (16-5) (7-2) RPI 39 SoS 141 – Can you make the case this is a true bubble team?  Eh.  The 3 top 100 wins are IPFW, MTSU, and UCSB.  Can’t do it.  Game effort, though.
IPFW (16-6) (7-2) RPI 80 SoS 175 – Probably not a NIT team.
Omaha (13-8) (7-2) RPI 119 SoS 174
IUPUI (10-13) (7-2) RPI 160 SoS 146 – This has the potential to be a fun conference race to watch.  IUPUI is the clear outlier; the other 3 should climb out of the 16 and 15 lines, at least.

EIEIO/Vegas watch:
North Dakota St (12-8) (4-4) RPI 136 SoS 216 – Meanwhile, I’m surprised this team is off the pace.
Denver (11-11) (3-6) RPI 210 SoS 220

No postseason:
It’s been a banner year for the Summit, up to 11th in the CRPI.  IPFW and Omaha and others have done good.  Even Oral Roberts (9-12, 3-6) and South Dakota (9-13, 2-7) are sub-200 RPI helping everyone out.  The only real failure is Western Illinois (4-13, 0-9).  This is going to help the seed of the conference in particular.  South Dakota St in particular will be tough to predict, given their RPI.

SWAC

Conference title race:
Texas Southern (9-11) (8-0) RPI 211 SoS 291
Southern (12-7) (7-2) RPI 184 SoS 343 – Southern actually beat Mississippi St.  And the conference is ranked #31!  Not #32!  Not last!  Won’t help any of their teams avoid the play-in game this year, but still.

No postseason:
Well, Jackson St (9-10, 6-2) will probably get eligible, but I’m not sure there’s enough room for a third SWAC postseason team.  Alcorn St (6-12, 6-3) is ineligible so it won’t matter if they get there.  Everyone else is below .500 in everything and in various levels of irrelevance.  Alabama A&M (6-10, 3-5), Arkansas-Pine Bluff (5-17, 3-5), Grambling (3-14, 3-5), Mississippi Valley St (3-19, 3-5), Alabama St (4-14, 1-7), and Prairie View A&M (1-19, 1-7).

WAC

Conference title race:
New Mexico St (13-8) (6-1) RPI 146 SoS 208 – Not a good non-con for them, so they’re heading to the 16 line.
Cal St-Bakersfield (12-7) (5-2) RPI 149 SoS 295

No postseason:

Actually, Grand Canyon (18-3, 6-1) is ineligible for the NIT but is plenty eligible for the CIT, so look for that.  Everyone else is out of the picture, including Seattle (8-11, 4-3), Utah Valley (6-13, 3-4), UMKC (6-13, 2-5), UTRGV (3-16, 2-5), and Chicago St (1-20, 0-7).

Bubble watch part 4: Upper majors

A-10

Should be in:

Dayton (18-3) (8-1) RPI 13 SoS 36
Vital signs:  6-2 R/N, non-con SoS 2, 3-2 vs. Top 50, 10-2 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  N-Iowa, N-Monmouth, GWU
Bad losses:  @LaSalle
It may be harsh keeping them from the lockbox for now, but caution is necessary.  Those 10 top 100 wins are a shining beacon, but they include the likes of Alabama, William & Mary, Arkansas, Davidson, St Bonaventure, etc etc.  Still, they’re computer profile monsters and aren’t going to miss without a big collapse.

Bubble:

VCU (16-5) (8-0) RPI 33 SoS 64
Vital signs:  5-4 R/N, non-con SoS 88, 1-2 vs. Top 50, 6-5 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  @St Joe’s, @Davidson?  @MTSU?
Bad losses:  @Georgia Tech, probably
Whiffed on their best chances at a win OOC (Duke, WIsky, FSU, Cincy, et al).  So evaluating this resume is tricky.  Now, if they stay undefeated in the A-10, it won’t matter.  But the marginal loss is coming, and trying to figure out where the resume stands when there’s little signature material is tough.  Nothing great, but nothing bad on the computer profile so far.

George Washington (16-5) (5-3) RPI 52 SoS 121
Vital signs:  5-4 R/N, non-con SoS 185, 2-1 vs. Top 50, 3-2 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  Virginia, Seton Hall
Bad losses:  @DePaul, @St Louis
On the whole, the signature win erases the couple bad road losses, but it leaves a marginal situation where there’s not a lot on the meat of this bone.  Marginal non-con leads to limited signature win chances, and they’re done with Dayton for the year.  Where you put them is probably directly correlated with how highly you regard Virginia.

St Joseph’s (18-3) (7-1) RPI 30 SoS 98
Vital signs:  9-1 R/N, non-con SoS 93, 0-3 vs. Top 50, 3-3 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  @Temple?  Seriously, this is the best
Bad losses:  actually, none
The quintessential good bad team:  no good wins anywhere, nothing even remotely close to even a marginal loss.  The W-L is shiny, the SoS is pretty solid, the road-neutral record is great.  But they just need one quality win, somewhere, anywhere.  If they get it, it’s tough to ignore the road wins here.

NIT watch:
Davidson (11-7) (4-4) RPI 57 SoS 40 – When your signature win is Charleston, I can’t get on board.  Their SoS numbers are better than they should be.
St Bonaventure (13-6) (5-3) RPI 61 SoS 89 – The same signature win problem that so many A-10 schools have crops up here too.  Not unsalvageable if they can get it, though.

EIEIO/Vegas watch:
Duquesne (14-7) (5-4) RPI 93 SoS 138
Rhode Island (12-9) (4-4) RPI 105 SoS 68
Richmond (11-9) (3-5) RPI 113 SoS 82
Fordham (11-8) (3-6) RPI 171 SoS 172 – The one thing the A-10 always seems to do:  produce a ridiculous number of teams that won’t make the NIT but are perfect candidates for the CBI.  It’s uncanny how they do it.

No postseason:

Congrats for Fordham for possibly graduating from this group.  The four poor teams this year:  St Louis (8-13, 3-6), UMass (8-12, 1-7), George Mason (7-14, 1-7), and LaSalle (4-14, 1-7).

AAC

Bubble:

Cincinnati (16-6) (6-3) RPI 58 SoS 90
Vital signs:  6-3 R/N, non-con SoS 179, 1-3 vs. Top 50, 4-3 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  N-GWU, @VCU, @UConn
Bad losses:  swept by Temple
The conference as a whole has been in poor form, and it hurts Cincy by depriving them of quality win chances.  The non-con SoS was anchored by some terrible teams, as Cincy won 2 of their 5 games of consequence.  There’s little this team can do but hold serve and hope to get one against SMU to fortify the resume.  This position is marginal at best.

UConn (15-6) (5-3) RPI 55 SoS 73
Vital signs:  5-4 R/N, non-con SoS 69, 2-2 vs. Top 50, 4-6 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  N-Michigan, @Texas, Ohio St?
Bad losses:  Temple at home is the worst one
The good news is there’s really a lack of catastrophic losses, and there’s a couple wins that you can actually point and be proud at.  Still, sub-.500 against the top 100 is going to be untenable in March.  Not much chance for self-correction in conference play, but that’s the only path forward now.  Expect this resume to go down to the wire.

Tulsa (14-7) (6-3) RPI 64 SoS 66
Vital signs:  6-4 R/N, non-con SoS 77, 1-2 vs. Top 50, 3-5 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  Wichita St, UConn, and buh
Bad losses:  ORU at home, @Houston perhaps
Barely on this page thanks to Wichita St, and workable vital signs.  Not a great chance, but a chance, to stay relevant in the bubble picture.

NIT watch:
Temple (12-8) (6-3) RPI 76 SoS 67 – Yeah, they beat SMU and @UConn and Cincy…and also lost to Houston and @ECU and several other more tolerable ones.  I could be persuaded to go the other way on this and at least list them on the bubble.  But I’m just not feeling it.

EIEIO/Vegas watch:
Houston (15-6) (5-4) RPI 131 SoS 210 – Oh yeah, beat Tulsa and Temple and LSU and…has a non-con SoS of 337.  Nope.
Memphis (13-8) (4-4) RPI 124 SoS 97
Central Florida (10-9) (4-4) RPI 194 SoS 209

No postseason:
Well played, SMU (19-1, 8-1).  You’re the only surefire tournament team in the conference and you’re not even eligible.  They’re vacuuming all the in-conference wins and keeping everyone else from getting a signature win.  This can lead to the catastrophic one-bid scenario, which is very much in play.  I doubt it comes to pass, just because Cincy and UConn are too good of teams to mess it up.  But still, this is closer than this conference ever should’ve been to 1 bid.  At the bottom, we’ve got East Carolina (10-12, 2-7), South Florida (5-18, 2-8), and Tulane (8-15, 1-9).  At least their RPIs trend towards the low 200s instead of the high 200s.

Horizon

Bubble:

Valparaiso (17-4) (9-1) RPI 38 SoS 156
Vital signs:  8-4 R/N, non-con SoS 51, 0-1 vs. Top 50, 3-2 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  @Oregon St, @URI?  IPFW?
Bad losses:  @Wright St and @Ball St aren’t great
I want to give this profile a chance.  A good road record mark, a good strong non-con SoS (a loss to Oregon is mixed in there), not awful vital signs.  But the Oregon St win is not as great, and there is no chance of another signature win anywhere.  The margin of error is beyond thin for them.  It’s paper-thin.  I’m just not sure where this profile goes with another loss.

EIEIO/Vegas watch:
Wright St (11-10) (7-3) RPI 170 SoS 189
Milwaukee (13-7) (6-3) RPI 151 SoS 248
Oakland (14-8) (6-3) RPI 142 SoS 212
Green Bay (11-9) (5-4) RPI 162 SoS 236 – There’s not much difference in teams 2-5 in this conference.  They’re all kinda the same as far as bracketology purposes go, and all of them will have a landing spot in an EIEIO tournament.

No postseason:
At least the conference had the foresight to separate into an upper class and lower class.  Detroit (8-11, 4-6), Youngstown St (7-14, 4-6), Cleveland St (5-16, 2-8), and UIC (1-18, 1-9) are a pretty clear lower tier.  Northern Kentucky (6-12, 4-5), meanwhile, is still reclassifying.

MAAC

Bubble:

Monmouth (17-5) (9-2) RPI 37 SoS 127
Vital signs:  11-5 R/N, non-con SoS 16, 2-2 vs. Top 50, 5-2 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  @UCLA, N-Notre Dame, N-USC
Bad losses:  @Canisius, @Army, @Manhattan
So there’s plenty going on here.  A whopping 16 road/neutral games already, and the committee has shown they’ll reward teams that do that.  3 bad road losses are somewhat masked by many signature road wins (toss Georgetown in there as well).  Great non-con SoS.  All and all, this is an at-large team, plain and simple.  The issue?  The conference is filled with landmines yet to come.

EIEIO/Vegas watch:
Siena (15-7) (8-3) RPI 86 SoS 174 – Is Siena within NIT range?  Probably not given the lack of true signature win that most teams like them need for the at-large.
Iona (11-9) (8-3) RPI 179 SoS 207
Fairfield (12-9) (6-5) RPI 153 SoS 170

No postseason:
St Peter’s (8-11, 6-4) isn’t even above .500 despite leading the conference for a little bit.  This is a clue towards the overall disappointment of the conference, lower than they usually are in the CRPI.  The failures:  Manhattan (8-11, 5-5), Rider (9-13, 5-6), Canisius (10-13, 5-7), Niagara (6-17, 4-8), Quinnipiac (6-13, 3-7), and Marist (4-16, 1-10).

Mountain West

Bubble:

San Diego St (14-6) (9-0) RPI 47 SoS 58
Vital signs:  7-3 R/N, non-con SoS 15, 1-3 vs. Top 50, 3-4 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  N-Cal, @Boise, @LBSU?
Bad losses:  Grand Canyon
The situation has become untenable for the MWC, and SDSU is their only hope now.  It’s not that great a resume, either.  The strong non-con (with very few tangible results from them) will help the cause, and the road/neutral record is solid too.  However, they are in desperate need of a couple more quality wins, and aren’t going to get them because of the rest of the conference.  Not a good position to be in, because they can’t gain ground quickly on the bubble.

NIT watch:
Boise St (13-7) (6-3) RPI 87 SoS 103 – I can’t even make the case, even with a win over Oregon.  Back to back losses to UNLV and New Mexico have killed the value of the resume, and nothing is overwhelming in the vital signs to make me change my mind.  However, nothing is fatal either, so we’ll revisit in a couple weeks if we have to.

EIEIO/Vegas watch:
New Mexico (13-8) (6-2) RPI 123 SoS 131
Fresno St (12-7) (5-3) RPI 114 SoS 139
Nevada (11-8) (5-4) RPI 120 SoS 153
Colorado St (10-9) (4-4) RPI 197 SoS 215
UNLV (11-9) (4-5) RPI 121 SoS 93 – Man, what a random hodgepodge of teams.  Or, more accurately, a mess.  They all feel the same.  UNLV beat Oregon and Indiana and couldn’t back it up.  Everyone else in this list combined for 0 Top 75 wins.  Good job good effort, conference.

No postseason:
The conference is a catastrophic 12th in the RPI right now.  There’s really only one really bad link:  San Jose St (4-15, 2-8).  No one else is awful.  The real problem is no one is high at all, and everyone else is below average.  Wyoming (9-12, 4-6), Utah St (9-9, 3-6), and Air Force (8-12, 1-8) are all moderately disappointing.  Everyone is moderately disappointing, which makes the whole conference massively disappointing.

MVC

Should be in:
Wichita St (15-5) (10-0) RPI 31 SoS 86
Vital signs:  6-5 R/N, non-con SoS 5, 1-3 vs. Top 50, 3-5 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  Utah, aaaand we might be done here.  Swept Evansville?
Bad losses:  they’re all inside the top 65
Well, there’s a distinct lack of signature wins given the opportunity (losing to USC, Iowa, among others).  But there’s injury reasons for that.  The committee loves teams that scheduled up, and they’re likely to give Wichita a break because of that.  They’re fine barring any bad losses (which is the one thing they’ve avoided so far).

NIT watch:
Evansville (17-5) (7-3) RPI 78 SoS 177 – The non-con SoS approaching 250 makes their case a non-starter.  N-Irvine is a fine win, but it can’t be the pillar that supports your at-large campaign.

EIEIO/Vegas watch:
Southern Illinois (18-5) (7-3) RPI 130 SoS 278 – Non-con SoS of 335.  That’s not optimal.
Indiana St (11-10) (6-4) RPI 122 SoS 95
Illinois St (11-11) (6-4) RPI 147 SoS 109 – They’ve got a top 10 non-con SoS.  Hey now.
Northern Iowa (11-11) (4-6) RPI 143 SoS 119 – Yep, beat UNC and Iowa St and this is where they’re at.

No postseason:
The conference itself is 13th in RPI.  A disaster this year.  Everyone has been a failure in one respect or another, because of injury (WSU), poor scheduling (UE, SIU), poor inexplicable form (UNI), or otherwise.  Loyola(Chi) (9-12, 3-7) is underperforming.  Also out:  Drake (5-16, 1-9) and Bradley (2-20, 1-9).

SoCon

Bubble:

Chattanooga (16-3) (7-1) RPI 44 SoS 187
Vital signs:  10-3 R/N, non-con SoS 187, 1-1 vs. Top 50, 2-1 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  @Georgia, @Dayton, Illinois?
Bad losses:  @ULR, @Furman
Whoa, Chattanooga makes the bubble list?  For now, yes.  Two of these losses are legit problems (the other was Iowa St), and they did win at Dayton and have 10 road wins.  The committee will forgive bad road losses if you go on the road a bunch and win many other ones.  This is that case.  Of issue is that the non-con SoS is very poor for a mid-major candidate, but still.  That signature win over Dayton is very valuable right now and at least gets them in the door.

EIEIO/Vegas watch:
Furman (11-10) (7-3) RPI 185 SoS 230
Mercer (14-6) (6-3) RPI 132 SoS 299
East Tennessee St (11-9) (6-3) RPI 134 SoS 167 – A pretty uninspiring group chasing Chattanooga here.  Not even sure all deserve the postseason, but they’ll get a couple or all three in.

No postseason:
I have nothing much to say here.  Wofford (8-12, 6-3) and Samford (9-11, 2-7) aren’t complete zeroes, but it seems like UNC-Greensboro (5-14, 4-5), Citadel (7-12, 3-6), Western Carolina (5-14, 3-6), and VMI (3-14, 1-8) are going to actively harm Chattanooga’s profile simply by taking the court alongside them.

Sun Belt

Bubble:

Arkansas-Little Rock (17-2) (9-1) RPI 51 SoS 251
Vital signs:  10-2 R/N, non-con SoS 267, 1-1 vs. Top 50, 2-1 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  @SDSU, @Tulsa
Bad losses:  @Arkansas St
The bad is the non-con SoS.  If you’re a mid-major, you have to schedule up to have a chance.  On the other hand, that road-neutral record is a shining beacon.  It’s going to be right on the edge, but they have no choice but to run the table or come close.  No margin of error when that SoS number is that poor.

NIT watch:
Texas-Arlington (13-6) (5-4) RPI 111 SoS 227 – A big downturn has buried UTA after they won at Ohio St and Memphis early.

EIEIO/Vegas watch:
Louisiana-Lafayette (9-8) (7-3) RPI 138 SoS 167 – Nothing notable in the resume, but second in this conference will be worth a postseason bid.
Georgia St (10-7) (5-5) RPI 127 SoS 165 – This one is less sure.

No postseason:
Louisiana-Monroe (8-11, 6-4) and Arkansas St (8-11, 6-4) could certainly get to .500 and get eligible.  The bottom five have no hope:  South Alabama (7-12, 4-6), Georgia Southern (6-12, 4-6), Appalachian St (6-15, 4-6), Texas St (7-9, 3-6), and Troy (4-15, 1-9).

WCC

Bubble:

St Mary’s (17-2) (9-1) RPI 39 SoS 188
Vital signs:  3-2 R/N, non-con SoS 212, 0-1 vs. Top 50, 4-2 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  Gonzaga, Stanford, Irvine?
Bad losses:  none, do you want to count @Pepperdine?
The flaws are noticeable:  They played only one road game, and THEY STILL HAVEN’T LEFT THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIS ENTIRE SEASON.  The committee loves to bash this type of resume.  They can’t drop a road game against a bad team (Pepperdine doesn’t count as bad).  I’m scared to say this team is safe, and I’ll continue to say it the entire season no matter what.

Gonzaga (16-5) (9-2) RPI 73 SoS 115
Vital signs:  6-2 R/N, non-con SoS 44, 1-3 vs. Top 50, 3-5 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  N-UConn, N-Washington, and um.
Bad losses:  BYU at home
There’s good and there’s bad.  No bad losses to kill them, and a good road/neutral record.  Against them, a lack of big wins.  The losses are kinda manageable (UCLA and BYU and Arizona, all at home).  At some point you have to bink one, and they didn’t.  I just don’t feel very good about this resume, but the solid non-con SoS might be the difference.

NIT watch:
BYU (15-7) (7-3) RPI 59 SoS 117 – I just can’t quite make the case.  Good group of wins on paper (N-UNM, N-UNI, Gonzaga, Belmont, Utah St) but they all look worse based on how those teams are doing.  A loss at Portland is the dagger right now.

EIEIO/Vegas watch:
Pepperdine (13-8) (7-4) RPI 98 SoS 147
San Francisco (11-10) (5-6) RPI 225 SoS 277

No postseason:
The conference is 13th in the RPI.  That probably won’t end up hurting St Mary’s or Gonzaga, but it definitely could have.  That’s a big problem, and you can blame the bottom six teams for that.  San Fran might stay above .500, but the others are sub-200 in the RPI and hopeless:  Pacific (4-14, 4-6) is ineligible anyways, and there’s also Santa Clara (7-15, 4-7), Loyola Marymount (9-12, 3-8), Portland (8-15, 3-8), and San Diego (6-14, 2-8).

Bubble watch part 3: ACC/Big East

ACC

Lockbox:

North Carolina (19-2) (8-0) RPI 8 SoS 50
Vital signs:  7-2 R/N, non-con SoS 52, 4-1 vs. Top 50, 11-1 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  Maryland, @Syracuse?  @FSU?
Bad losses:  @UNI
This is a 1 seed, as well they should be, but there is a concern:  only one win over a surefire tournament team.  Now, it’s pretty tough to play 8 games in the ACC without playing a sure tournament team, so this problem is going to rectify itself shortly.  Schedule has some backloaded goodness, so they’ll either pile signature wins in a hurry or lose their #1 seed.  Just know that for now, their 1 seed is based largely on circumstance.

Virginia (17-4) (6-3) RPI 9 SoS 19
Vital signs:  7-4 R/N, non-con SoS 59, 8-1 vs. Top 50, 12-3 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  Villanova, Miami, @Louisville, N-WVU
Bad losses:  @VT, @GT
Two things stick out.  First, an actual losing road record (the neutral record pads what you see above).  It’s tough to imagine a top 3 seed with that mark against it.  On the other end, a staggering 8 top 50 wins.  I can buy an argument anywhere from the 2 line to the 4 line right now, trending in the direction of the 2 line.   There’s some non-trivial road games coming up though that will give Virginia a legitimate chance at the 1 line.

Miami (16-4) (5-3) RPI 16 SoS 55
Vital signs: 6-3 R/N, non-con SoS 78, 5-1 vs. Top 50, 9-3 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  N-Utah and Butler, Duke
Bad losses:  probably @NC State, Northeastern
An aggressive lock, but I’ll give it to them.  Generally solid vital signs across the board, no significant weaknesses, solid overall profile.  I can’t pick this nit, unless you want to overweight the Northeastern home loss.

Should be in:

Louisville (17-4) (6-2) RPI 26 SoS 81
Vital signs:  4-3 R/N, non-con SoS 200, 2-3 vs. Top 50, 5-4 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  Pitt, FSU, Wake?
Bad losses:  I suppose @Clemson
I’m hesitant to call it a lock just because of the non-con.  Poor power numbers combined with a signature win of…Grand Canyon?  North Florida?  Too much stress put on delivering in the conference schedule to ensure a bid.  And they really haven’t hit the meat of that schedule yet.  This seed can wildly vary over the next month, so pay attention.

Duke (15-6) (4-4) RPI 27 SoS 18
Vital signs:  5-4 R/N, non-con SoS 10, 2-5 vs. Top 50, 9-6 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  N-VCU, Indiana, N-Georgetown?
Bad losses:  @Clemson perhaps, nothing else is bad at all
Now, it’s fair to panic just a little bit.  But there’s still a sterling SoS number, a few decent enough wins, and generally okay vital signs.  It’ll take losses in bulk to hurt them, really.  Although I might want a better signature win or two, just in case.

Bubble:

Pittsburgh (16-4) (6-3) RPI 31 SoS 69
Vital signs:  4-2 R/N, non-con SoS 155, 3-2 vs. Top 50, 7-4 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  N-Davidson, @Notre Dame, Syracuse
Bad losses:  NC State at home
Am I being harsh putting them on the bubble?  Perhaps.  The difference between them and Duke?  The non-con SoS.  The committee will pay attention to that; so will I.  That plus one bad loss puts them here, although they should be fine without something egregious.

Notre Dame (15-6) (6-3) RPI 35 SoS 39
Vital signs:  4-5 R/N, non-con SoS 56, 2-5 vs. Top 50, 5-6 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  N-Iowa, @Duke, um.
Bad losses:  N-Alabama is the worst by far
This is a big improvement over previous years by Notre Dame.  There’s actually a good SoS to work with!  That’s why even though they’re on the bubble, they’re in reasonably good shape for the time being.  Plenty to time to swing in either direction, though.

Clemson (13-8) (6-3) RPI 88 SoS 73
Vital signs:  2-6 R/N, non-con SoS 330, 6-4 vs. Top 50, 6-6 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  Duke, Louisville, Miami, Pitt
Bad losses:  @Minnesota, N-UMass
Oh man, break out the wall of text on this one.  First things first:  that road record is untenable.  Must improve to get an at-large bid.  Home record is plenty fine; they can beat anyone there and already have.  So they don’t need more signature wins, what they need is to beat bad teams on the road.  And guess what’s coming up:  BC, NC State, GT, Wake.  All on the road.  Get 3 of those 4 and we’ve got a stew going, Clemson.  Meanwhile, the non-con was a disaster with that SoS weighted down by 4 sub-300 teams and losses to Georgia and South Carolina mixed in.  There’s a lot going on here.

Syracuse (15-8) (5-5) RPI 43 SoS 28
Vital signs:  5-5 R/N, non-con SoS 110, 3-4 vs. Top 50, 7-7 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  N-UConn, N-Texas A&M, @Duke
Bad losses:  @St John’s, Clemson?
There’s some good high-end wins which may save the resume.  I can’t find a specific vital sign with this resume that screams OUT to me.  There’s one bad losing streak in there, but if they prove that was an anomaly, they might actually be fine.

Florida St (14-7) (4-5) RPI 44 SoS 53
Vital signs:  7-5 R/N, non-con SoS 212, 3-5 vs. Top 50, 6-7 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  N-VCU, @Florida, Virginia
Bad losses:  N-Hofstra?
I’d feel so much better with a better SoS number than 212.  I think eventually there’s going to be no room for them at the table, but for the time being they’re right on the edge.  I wouldn’t put them in, but I wouldn’t stop anyone else from doing so.

NIT watch:
Virginia Tech (12-10) (4-5) RPI 125 SoS 65 – If they can hang on, the win over Virginia might carry them to the NIT.

No postseason:

Even though everyone but Boston College (7-14, 0-8) is around .500, there’s too many losses to spread around in the conference.  I expect Georgia Tech (12-9, 2-6), North Carolina St (12-10, 2-7), and Wake Forest (10-11, 1-8) to be casualties even though they’re all in the top 100 in the RPI.  I could pick one to survive, but I don’t feel like it.  They can all die.

Big East

Lockbox:

Villanova (18-3) (8-1) RPI 2 SoS 7
Vital signs:  8-2 R/N, non-con SoS 27, 4-3 vs. Top 50, 9-3 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  Xavier, @St Joe’s, swept Seton Hall
Bad losses:  none
If there is a nit to pick, only 4 top 50 wins, and two of them are Seton Hall.  Could use more beef, and the non-con SoS number is better than it looks.  Still, a pretty obvious 1 seed candidate at the moment.

Xavier (19-2) (7-2) RPI 4 SoS 25
Vital signs:  9-1 R/N, non-con SoS 28, 5-1 vs. Top 50, 9-2 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  N-Dayton, N-USC, @Provi
Bad losses:  home to Georgetown ain’t great
Good work in the non-con, @Michigan and Cincy didn’t even get listed.  That one Georgetown loss is probably what keeps them from #1 overall.  In excellent shape for the 1 line at the moment.

Providence (18-4) (6-3) RPI 23 SoS 47
Vital signs:  8-1 R/N, non-con SoS 171, 2-3 vs. Top 50, 6-3 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  N-Arizona, @Villanova, swept Butler
Bad losses:  Marquette
An aggressive promotion to the lockbox, given their non-con SoS, but winning at Villanova is worth a lot on the resume.  Very good R/N record which helps mute the bad home loss.  You’d like more bulk in quality wins, and they’ll need it for a protected seed, but that doesn’t harm the lock status.

Bubble:

Butler (14-7) (3-6) RPI 69 SoS 81
Vital signs:  5-5 R/N, non-con SoS 195, 1-5 vs. Top 50, 3-5 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  @Cincy, N-Purdue
Bad losses:  @Creighton and Marquette, probably
Hmm.  Nothing is a red flag here.  A couple nice wins…the losses are forgivable (N-Miami, swept by Provi, Nova, etc.).  A couple bad road losses swing the situation, though.  The non-con SoS is surprisingly poor, thanks to 4 sub-300 teams (I mean, when you have Puerto Rico, @Cincy, Purdue on there, you don’t expect 195).  Now they’ll be in a legitimate bubble fight and could swing either way.

Seton Hall (15-6) (5-4) RPI 46 SoS 74
Vital signs:  6-4 R/N, non-con SoS 239, 2-3 vs. Top 50, 3-5 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  Wichita St, @Providence, uh.
Bad losses:  Creighton at home, I suppose N-LBSU
That non-con SoS could be a big issue that can’t be fixed without a couple more signature wins.  All the vital signs are okay, but not great.  This is a pretty boring bubble profile, you have to admit.  And when it’s boring, you look for outliers.  The outlier is non-con SoS 239.  Not good.

Georgetown (13-9) (6-3) RPI 76 SoS 31
Vital signs:  5-4 R/N, non-con SoS 53, 2-5 vs. Top 50, 4-6 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  Syracuse, @Xavier, N-Wisky?
Bad losses:  UNC-Asheville, Radford
This is very generous listing them here, as the Xavier win just gets them on the board.  Much work to do.  It’s going to be tough to erase a few of these unnecessary losses.

NIT watch:
Creighton (14-8) (5-4) RPI 101 SoS 114 – I can buy a NIT bid for this team with some good Big East wins.  But I’m not optimistic they can hold this chance.
Marquette (15-7) (4-5) RPI 113 SoS 122 – This might be even more optimistic.  At least they beat LSU, Arizona St, and Wisky in the non-con.

No postseason:
No surprise DePaul (7-14, 1-8) and St John’s (6-15, 0-9) are down here.

Bubble watch part 2: B1G/Pac-12

Big 10

Lockbox:

Iowa (17-4) (8-1) RPI 7 SoS 8
Vital signs:  6-4 R/N, non-con SoS 68, 7-4 vs. Top 50, 7-4 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  Michigan Stx2, Purduex2
Bad losses:  I suppose N-UND if you’re going for the 1 line
The non-con was pedestrian.  Decent, but pedestrian, with Wichita and FSU on the good ledger.  Plenty has been accomplished in the B1G, though, so February is all about maintaining their seed.

Maryland (19-3) (8-2) RPI 6 SoS 30
Vital signs:  7-3 R/N, non-con SoS 80, 1-3 vs. Top 50, 7-3 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  Iowa, N-UConn, Georgetown?
Bad losses:  none
If there was one nitpick, it was that Maryland truly needed a signature win for a top 2 seed.  And they got it versus Iowa.  The next step is accumulation, as bulk quality wins are required for that really high seed.

Michigan St (19-4) (6-4) RPI 21 SoS 72
Vital signs:  9-2 R/N, non-con SoS 99, 5-2 vs. Top 50, 6-3 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  N-Kansas, N-Provi, Louisville
Bad losses:  Nebraska
Losing stretch aside, they’ll be fine.  That stretch might cost MSU the 1 line, though.  Everything else in the resume gives them a shot at it.

Purdue (19-4) (7-3) RPI 25 SoS 84
Vital signs:  6-3 R/N, non-con SoS 120, 3-2 vs. Top 50, 6-3 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  N-Florida, @Pitt, Michigan
Bad losses:  @Illinois
They’ll be fine.  Could or even should dock them a tier, but I’ll leave them in the lockbox.

Should be in:

Indiana (18-4) (8-1) RPI 49 SoS 143
Vital signs:  5-4 R/N, non-con SoS 198, 1-1 vs. Top 50, 4-3 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  N-Notre Dame, Wisky and Ohio St?
Bad losses:  N-UNLV and Wake
So, the record is a bit of a mirage.  The B1G schedule is backloaded for them, so they’ll either acquire quality wins or fall out of the bracket.  This situation will take care of itself.  For now, they have to be in, though.

Michigan (16-5) (7-2) RPI 29 SoS 70
Vital signs:  6-4 R/N, non-con SoS 85, 2-4 vs. Top 50, 3-5 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  N-Texas, Maryland, @NC State?
Bad losses:  none
All 5 losses are to good teams, N-UConn being by far the worst.  And the home loss was Xavier.  They’re fine right now.  Two quality wins are enough given the circumstances behind the losses.  The key is not slipping too far down and losing too any quality games.

Bubble:

Wisconsin (13-9) (5-4) RPI 65 SoS 13
Vital signs:  4-4 R/N, non-con SoS 41, 4-4 vs. Top 50, 6-5 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  N-VCU, @Syracuse, Michigan St
Bad losses:  @Northwestern, Milwaukee, WIU, on and on
There’s almost too many body blows absorbed, but I’ll give them a second look based on the quality wins.  In the end, the committee will pay attention to quality wins, so the dream isn’t dead.  But the degree of difficulty is very high here.  Gotta avoid anything that looks even questionable on the resume.

NIT watch:
Ohio St (14-9) (6-4) RPI 84 SoS 44 – Sure, Kentucky is a nice win.  It’s also their only top 100 win.
Northwestern (15-8) (3-7) RPI 106 SoS – Non-con SoS 327.  Nope.
Nebraska (12-10) (4-5) RPI 157 SoS 133 – Non-con SoS 311.  Nope.

No postseason:

The fodder is easy to identify in this conference:  Penn St (11-11, 2-7), Illinois (10-12, 2-7), Rutgers (5-16, 0-9), and Minnesota (6-16, 0-10).

Pac-12

Lockbox:

Oregon (17-4) (7-2) RPI 3 SoS 5
Vital signs:  5-4 R/N, non-con SoS 21, 6-1 vs. Top 50, 12-3 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  Baylor, USC, @Arizona, others
Bad losses:  N-UNLV
Everything is pretty well set, maybe minus one marginal loss or two.  1 line, nah.  2 line?  Sure, why not.

USC (17-5) (6-3) RPI 19 SoS 43
Vital signs:  4-5 R/N, non-con SoS 83, 4-4 vs. Top 50, 8-5 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  Arizona, @UCLA, N-Wichita
Bad losses:  @Oregon St perhaps
They’re in good shape overall on the profile.  No red flags, they’ve got good win depth, no home losses, they’re in a good spot.

Should be in:

Arizona (17-5) (5-4) RPI 34 SoS 90
Vital signs:  5-4 R/N, non-con SoS 226, 1-4 vs. Top 50, 8-5 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  @Gonzaga, @Stanford, Washington?
Bad losses:  none
Pretty poor non-conference overall, as Boise and Gonzaga didn’t come through for them.  They’re safe for now but they haven’t built up a good buffer in case they go on a losing streak.  Uncommon territory for Arizona.

Utah (16-5) (6-3) RPI 14 SoS 25
Vital signs:  6-4 R/N, non-con SoS 53, 6-4 vs. Top 50, 11-5 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  N-Duke, Colorado, Cal
Bad losses:  none
The worst loss is @Stanford.  The wins are good enough.  Solid vital signs up and down the board.  They are lockbox-adjacent.

Bubble:

Colorado (16-5) (6-3) RPI 20 SoS 32
Vital signs:  5-4 R/N, non-con SoS 88, 2-5 vs. Top 50, 6-5 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  Oregon, Cal, swept Stanford
Bad losses:  none
One theme among these Pac-12 schools:  bad loss avoidance.  That leaves many of them in good situations, Colorado included.  Could stand to beat the good teams juuuuust a little more often, but that’s a nitpick.

Washington (14-7) (6-3) RPI 49 SoS 34
Vital signs:  5-4 R/N, non-con SoS 138, 3-4 vs. Top 50, 6-6 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  N-Texas, USC, 2xUCLA
Bad losses:  Oakland, UCSB?
Ah, finally a marginal case in the Pac-12.  But the good is still pretty decent, all things considered.  The non-con has some issues but they’re fixable.  No need to make a final declaration on their hopes; the rest conference play will define that for us.

California (14-8) (4-5) RPI 39 SoS 23
Vital signs:  1-8 R/N, non-con SoS 114, 4-5 vs. Top 50, 7-7 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  Colorado, Utah, Arizona
Bad losses:  @Oregon St? N-Richmond too
A pretty obvious flaw here.  That road record is brutal although their road schedule has been brutal.  6 road losses to RPI 9, 3, 64, 57, 15, 20 and neutral ones to 47 and 114.  Only 4 road games left: Washingtons and Arizonas.  Gotta get 2 and maybe 3.  It almost doesn’t matter who they beat at home (as long as they don’t lose to marginal teams). 

UCLA (13-9) (4-5) RPI 68 SoS 18
Vital signs:  3-6 R/N, non-con SoS 31, 2-7 vs. Top 50, 7-8 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  Kentucky, @Gonzaga, Arizona
Bad losses:  @Wazzu, N-Wake?
If that 2-7 was 3-6, I’d feel better about this resume.  Much better.  The volume of losses might be the biggest issues here, along with perhaps the road record.  But for now, they’re a classic bubble team.

Stanford (10-9) (4-5) RPI 57 SoS 1
Vital signs:  2-5 R/N, non-con SoS 28, 2-9 vs. Top 50, 5-9 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  Utah, Cal
Bad losses:  The worst might be Cal at home
Two things save them:  all losses inside the top 50 and SoS 1.  With Oregon, USC, and Arizona among others left, winning a couple of those suddenly balances out the brutal schedule.  Stay tuned.

Oregon St (11-8) (3-6) RPI 64 SoS 16
Vital signs:  2-5 R/N, non-con SoS 110, 3-5 vs. Top 50, 5-8 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  Oregon, USC, Cal
Bad losses:  @Arizona St perhaps
Kinda a borderline case.

NIT watch:
Arizona St (12-10) (2-7) RPI 73 SoS 13 – Even they beat Texas A&M, but I mean, look at how crowded this conference is.

No postseason:
Washington St (8-12, 1-8) is the only one truly out at this point.

Bubble watch part 1: Big 12/SEC

Big 12

Lockbox:

Oklahoma (18-2) (6-2) RPI 1 SoS 8
Vital signs:  8-2 R/N, non-con SoS 70, 6-2 vs. Top 50, 8-2 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  N-Villanova, Iowa St, WVU
Bad losses:  none
No real issues with this resume, and plenty of signature win chances are still coming.  If anything, the margin of error for getting the #1 overall seed might be small.

Kansas (16-4) (5-3) RPI 5 SoS 3
Vital signs:  4-4 R/N, non-con SoS 32, 6-3 vs. Top 50, 7-3 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  Oklahoma, Kentucky, N-UCLA
Bad losses:  @Oklahoma St
Of possible issue is the R/N record, even though the wins include UCLA, Vandy, and SDSU.  But we’re nitpicking here.

Iowa St (16-5) (5-3) RPI 11 SoS 4
Vital signs:  6-4 R/N, non-con SoS 47, 7-4 vs. Top 50, 9-4 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  Oklahoma, Kansas, Iowa
Bad losses:  N-UNI
They’re in better shape than you think, with their quality wins.  You wish they didn’t lose to Baylor and @Texas, but wins of N-Colorado, Chattanooga, @Cincy help neutralize that.  They’ll be a protected seed, easily.

Should be in:

West Virginia (17-4) (6-2) RPI 14 SoS 40
Vital signs:  8-3 R/N, non-con SoS 130, 5-4 vs. Top 50, 6-4 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  Kansas, N-SDSU, swept K-State?
Bad losses:  none
Having no bad losses means they’re safe, but it’s not the greatest resume overall.  No depth in the quality win column (3 of the top 50 wins are K-State 2x and TTU), and the non-con SoS is merely okay.  A massive slide could knock them out, and the Big 12 is capable of sending a team on one.

Baylor (16-4) (6-2) RPI 17 SoS 45
Vital signs:  3-3 R/N, non-con SoS 155, 3-4 vs. Top 50, 5-4 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  @Iowa St, Vandy and @TTU?
Bad losses:  none
Kind of a mirror situation to WVU, without the bulk road wins.  Need more depth in the quality win column, while a string of losses could be trouble down the road.

Texas (14-7) (5-3) RPI 22 SoS 6
Vital signs:  3-6 R/N, non-con SoS 4, 5-5 vs. Top 50, 7-6 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  Iowa St, @WVU, UNC
Bad losses:  @TCU
Strong non-con SoS with some results of note (N-Washington, UNC, @Stanford) means the only real threat is aggregating a lot of losses down the stretch in conference play.  The road/neutral record is slightly discouraging especially since they’ve already lost on the road at TCU and TTU.  They need to get to 5 or 6 road wins to feel good.

Bubble:

Texas Tech (12-8) (2-6) RPI 40 SoS 7
Vital signs:  3-5 R/N, non-con SoS 46, 2-7 vs. Top 50, 3-8 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  Texas, UALR, South Dakota St
Bad losses:  @Arkansas?
Well, you morons keep putting them in your bracket, so I have to address them here.  Strong SoS until you realize they gamed the system pretty well to have a good non-con SoS.  No real signature win to lean on.  Lean profile except for the RPI.  So…get them out of your bracket.  Of course, this conference does provide plenty of signature win chances, so we’ll see.

NIT watch:
Kansas St (13-8) (2-6) RPI 50 SoS 22 – I can’t even make the case for the bubble for this team, and I imagine they’ll slip below .500 eventually, but for now, they’re listed here.

No postseason:

Oklahoma St (11-10, 2-6) and TCU (10-11, 1-7) will be nowhere near the NIT/Vegas given how many losses they’re going to absorb.

SEC

Lockbox:

Texas A&M (18-3) (7-1) RPI 12 SoS 42
Vital signs:  5-3 R/N, non-con SoS 33, 5-1 vs. Top 50, 9-3 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  Iowa St, N-Texas and Gonzaga at Atlantis
Bad losses:  @Arkansas
They’re mostly rolling the SEC like they should, and are moving up mostly as a product of not losing.  There’s enough in the non-con to support a really high seed, although I wonder if the 1 line is truly attainable.  All and all, smells like a 2 seed.

Kentucky (16-5) (6-2) RPI 18 SoS 41
Vital signs:  4-5 R/N, non-con SoS 19, 2-1 vs. Top 50, 7-4 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  N-Duke, Louisville, um…
Bad losses:  @Auburn
I could be talked into dropping them a tier, and there’s some warning signs here, but probably safe for now.  Getting signature wins is going to be tough, which means there’s a ceiling for their seed at about 3 or 4.

Should be in:

South Carolina (18-2) (6-2) RPI 28 SoS 163
Vital signs:  7-2 R/N, non-con SoS 257, 0-0 vs. Top 50, 6-1 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  N-Tulsa, @Clemson
Bad losses:  @Tennessee
I’m being generous putting them here, but I’ll at least respect the overall record.  But we’ll know more once they actually play a top 50 team.

Bubble:

Florida (14-7) (5-3) RPI 21 SoS 11
Vital signs:  4-6 R/N, non-con SoS 3, 2-5 vs. Top 50, 5-6 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  N-St Joe’s, WVU, LSU I guess
Bad losses:  @Tennessee, FSU at home probably
The WVU win finally gave them a signature win to lean on.  The non-con SoS is great, and losses at Miami and Michigan St are forgivable.  They have your typical bubble-in resume at this moment, and the computer profile is saving them for now.  Plenty of time for them to swing either way.

LSU (13-8) (6-2) RPI 83 SoS 60
Vital signs:  2-6 R/N, non-con SoS 153, 1-3 vs. Top 50, 6-6 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  Kentucky, @Vandy and Alabama?
Bad losses:  N-Marquette, Wake at home, @Charleston, blah blah blah
They are actually rallying for a reason unrelated to them:  the non-con SoS was around 250 a month ago, and their opponents are rallying in their conference play to make LSU’s number more tenable.  There’s still several marginal losses and only 1 win over a tournament team, though.  Much work to do.

Vanderbilt (12-9) (4-4) RPI 57 SoS 19
Vital signs:  3-7 R/N, non-con SoS 26, 1-7 vs. Top 50, 4-9 vs. Top 100
Signature wins:  Florida, N-Wake?
Bad losses:  @Arkansas probably
The only reason they get to be listed here?  Losses are acceptable.  N-Kansas, @Baylor, Dayton, @Purdue, on and on…they needed to beat 2 more of them to turn that 1-7 into a 3-5, but they’re not dead if they get on a big run.

NIT watch:
Georgia (11-8) (4-4) RPI 75 SoS 21 – No signature win to work with, so no dice.

EIEIO/Vegas watch:
Arkansas (11-10) (4-4) RPI 87 SoS 14 – The A&M win gives them a pulse, but no more thanks to the sheer quantity of losses
Ole Miss (13-8) (3-5) RPI 100 SoS 122
Alabama (11-9) (2-6) RPI 55 SoS 12 – Actually has wins over Wichita and UND and @Clemson…way too many body blows in the SEC though.

No postseason:
Auburn (9-11, 3-5), Mississippi St (9-11, 2-6), and Missouri (8-13, 1-7) are the fodder in this conference.  Tennessee (10-11, 3-5) might yet be able to fight back to .500, but I have to predict someone to fall back.

Bubble watch is coming

This blog is going into spam mode today, as bubble watches for all 351 teams in the country are getting posted up today.  They'll have the information you need to make your bracketing decisions.

2/1 S-CURVE

AQ shenanigans:
A-10:  VCU still leads while being on the at-large bubble
AAC:  Right now, Temple has the 3-way tiebreaker over Cincy and UConn
CAA:  Right now it's Hofstra
MAC:  Akron has now made it into the bracket
Pac-12:  Oregon to the lead here, the big thing is Washington being back on the at-large board
Southland:  For the first time, Stephen F Austin has ascended to the top here
Summit: IUPUI right now emerges from the tiebreakers in the 4-way tie.  Screw that, I'm putting SDSU in instead

The 1 line:  Oklahoma (18-2), North Carolina (19-2), Villanova (18-3), Xavier (19-2)
The 2 line:  Iowa (17-4), Kansas (16-4), Texas A&M (18-3), Virginia (17-4)
The 3 line:  Oregon (17-4), Maryland (19-3), Michigan St (19-4), Iowa St (16-5)
The 4 line:  Miami (16-4), Providence (18-4), Dayton (18-3), West Virginia (17-4)
The 5 line:  Purdue (19-4), USC (17-5), Kentucky (16-5), Baylor (16-4)
The 6 line:  Utah (16-5), Arizona (17-5), Louisville (17-4), Duke (15-6)
The 7 line:  Wichita St (15-5), Indiana (18-4), Michigan (16-5), Texas (14-7)
The 8 line:  Pittsburgh (16-4), South Carolina (18-2), Colorado (16-5), Notre Dame (15-6)
The 9 line:  Florida (14-7), Syracuse (15-8), Monmouth (17-5), California (14-8)
The 10 line:  St Joseph's (18-3), Cincinnati (16-6), Arkansas-Little Rock (17-2), Seton Hall (15-6)
The 11 line:  Butler (14-7), St Mary's (17-2), Valparaiso (17-4), Gonzaga (16-5), Washington (14-7)
The 12 line:  VCU (16-5), UCLA (13-9), Clemson (13-8), San Diego St (14-6), Chattanooga (16-3)
The 13 line:  Temple (12-8), South Dakota St (16-5), Akron (16-4), Hofstra (15-6)
The 14 line:  UC-Irvine (15-6), Yale (12-5), Stony Brook (15-4), UAB (17-4)
The 15 line:  Belmont (15-7), North Florida (15-6), Montana (10-7), Stephen F Austin (11-5)
The 16 line:  New Mexico St (13-8), UNC-Asheville (13-8), Bucknell (11-9), Hampton (12-8), Wagner (13-7), Texas Southern (9-11)

Bubble in:
Syracuse
Monmouth***
California

Next 4 in:
St Joseph's
Cincinnati
Arkansas-Little Rock***
Seton Hall
Butler

Last 4 in:
St Mary's***
Valparaiso***
Gonzaga
Washington
VCU***
UCLA
Clemson

Last 4 out:
UConn (15-6)
George Washington (16-5)
Florida St (14-7)
San Diego St***
Stanford (10-9)

Next 4 out:
Chattanooga***
Temple***
Oregon St (11-8)
Wisconsin (13-9)
Georgetown (13-9)
LSU (13-8)

Break it down!:
ACC 9
Pac-12 8
B1G 6
Big 12 6
Big East 5
SEC 4
A-10 3
AAC 2
WCC 2