Houston (21-1) (8-1) NET 7 SoS 67
Vital signs: 5-1 R/N, non-con
SoS 145, 2-1 vs. Quad 1, 8-0 vs. Quad 2, avg win 149
Signature wins: LSU, @USF? Utah St?
oof
Bad losses: @Temple, I guess
The problem is evident. A lack
of signature wins. Now, you can fix that
by winning everything, and Houston has.
But it 100% puts a cap on how high they can rise on the seed list. You can’t get a very high seed with 1 win
over a tourney team on the resume. They
do have Cincy twice yet, though.
Cincinnati (19-3) (8-1) NET 25 SoS 112
Vital signs: 6-2 R/N, non-con
SoS 171, 2-1 vs. Quad 1, 3-1 vs. Quad 2, avg win 162
Signature wins: N-Ole Miss,
@Temple, USF?
Bad losses: @ECU
A bit unfortunate their SoS is down a bit. They split with the 2 SEC Mississippi schools
in the non-con, and lost to OSU.
Scheduled well, but NKU, UCLA, George Mason, UNLV….down the line, their
opponents have hurt their SoS. As is,
they’re in an overall solid position, but can’t afford to slide too much. The resume can’t afford the cost of a loss to
other prospective bubble teams in the conference.
UCF (16-4) (6-2) NET 43 SoS 113
Vital signs: 5-3 R/N, non-con
SoS 138, 0-1 vs. Quad 1, 3-2 vs. Quad 2, avg win 163
Signature wins: Alabama, Temple,
@UConn?
Bad losses: FAU, @Wichita
Bad losses: FAU, @Wichita
Their only Quad 1 game was a loss to Memphis. There’s just nothing in the resume that suggest tournament team, to be honest. Every aspect just isn’t good enough. Now, the good news is they have 4 games with Cincy and Houston in the hopper, so this situation will fix itself. However, it might take more than 1 win in those games to get there.
Temple (16-6) (6-3) NET 54 SoS 42
Vital signs: 8-4 R/N, non-con
SoS 161, 1-5 vs. Quad 1, 5-0 vs. Quad 2, avg win 165
Signature wins: Houston,
N-Davidson? Memphis?
Bad losses: Penn
At least with Temple, they split with Houston, giving them some kind of
backbone to the resume. 6 true road wins
is good too, but the lack of depth of quality wins will be an issue going
forward. They’ve already spent one of
their Cincy games and both Houston games, so they won’t have many chances to
enhance the resume going forward.
VCU (15-6) (6-2) NET 48 SoS 17
Vital signs: 4-5 R/N, non-con
SoS 2, 1-3 vs. Quad 1, 2-2 vs. Quad 2, avg win 151
Signature wins: @Texas,
N-Temple, Hofstra?
Bad losses: Charleston, @URI,
@ODU?
Gets respect for the SoS, and the signature wins feel comparable to
other bubble teams. The A-10 being down
has killed their chances to add quality wins though, and it’s going to make the
degree of difficulty very high for getting an at-large bid. But they should be on the board, thanks to
that SoS.
Davidson (15-5) (7-1) NET 63 SoS 114
Vital signs: 6-5 R/N, non-con
SoS 142, 0-2 vs. Quad 1, 4-1 vs. Quad 2, avg win 169
Signature wins: VCU, @St
Louis? N-Northeastern?
Bad losses: @St Joe’s, @Wake
Probably not in play on the bubble.
But the losses are bad but not catastrophic, so as A-10 leader we’ll let
them hang around until they lose their way off the bubble. But there’s not much going on here.
St Louis (14-8) (5-4) NET 122 SoS 147
Vital signs: 3-6 R/N, non-con
SoS 164, 1-2 vs. Quad 1, 2-3 vs. Quad 2, avg win 200
Signature wins: @Seton Hall,
Butler, Oregon St
Bad losses: Richmond, @SIU,
@Duquesne
This is generous. The non-con
results let them stay on the board for now.
I guess.
Off the board (American):
South Florida is 15-6. With a
332 non-con SoS and 1 Quad 1-2 win (home to Memphis). You can’t justify them right now, they need
multiple wins against legit AAC teams to pretend to have a chance. Similarly, Memphis and UConn lack Quad 1-2
wins, which really kill their case before they can make an argument. SMU and Tulsa are losing in conference play which
makes their case even easier to dismiss.
I wouldn’t discount the odds of someone in this group making a big run, but
don’t give any of these teams a reasonable chance until they’re deep into that
run.
Off the board (A-10):
Dayton would seem like a natural at-large candidate, and maybe I’m being harsh listing them down here. Their only win in the top 2 quads is Butler, though. And an avg win of 201. Pass for now. George Mason and Duquesne are hanging out at the top of the league, but have terrible overall resumes. I’ll throw URI down here for now.
Dayton would seem like a natural at-large candidate, and maybe I’m being harsh listing them down here. Their only win in the top 2 quads is Butler, though. And an avg win of 201. Pass for now. George Mason and Duquesne are hanging out at the top of the league, but have terrible overall resumes. I’ll throw URI down here for now.
No comments:
Post a Comment